Posts
Having worked for various BI projects, often it comes to time to make decision on what tool or technology to use to implement the requirements. Often, the company has a great vision knowing where they want to go and what roadmap they want to follow, but they don't know what technology will be the best for them to achieve their goals and meet their budget. So many OBIEE projects are having difficulties and issues because from the beginning, OBIEE simply wasn't the most ideal tool for what the clients want to do. Not saying OBIEE can't do certain things (actually, there are certain things they can't), it's just that the complexity, resources and time that would involve don't always match the expectation that the clients had in mind during POCs. Therefore, It is very important to first understand that POC and real life implementation are too different things, I am just going to be as honest as I can be for the benefit of all.
Any tools can look great during POC where you don't have real data and real scalability issues. Every problem can be solved 'in theory' if the simple POC works. Look at T.V commercials, advertisements, these are the work of the best marketing genius of the world. They know how to make things look great on T.V, in ads and in demo, which is just a variation of the 'prove of concept' for general consumers. What happen after you blow your wallet for some magical weight-loss pills or some total package home care system, or even a weekend self-help workshops that promises to change your life? Then you realize that things aren't as good as what you see at first site. The bottom-line, POC is just a simple sales demo, which is not restricted to any specific environments against specific wants and needs. Now it is the buyer's responsibility to know how to apply that to their specific requirements and making it work. Anyways, enough of that.
Now lets look at what are some of the things that OBIEE isn't very efficient at doing compared to some other open source java reporting tools:
1. The implementation of localization and internationalization of OBIEE reports isn't very straightforward. There are blogs and documents out there that explains how to do such things in OBIEE, but go through them and try to implement it yourself. You will see that it does take a lot of work. Now integrating it with other home-grown java applications while maintaining the OBIEE local languages and time zones in Synch with that application is another thing. I am not saying it can't work, but it is complicated and it does take time and resources (Money.) The same thing can be done fairly easily in tools like Jasper.
2. New reporting requirements from the business users can't always be fulfilled right away. Oftenly, the requirements are identified from the OLTP side, but it is going to go through an ETL process and OBIEE configuration process before it can be made available for reporting. Several places can cause issues and there are many interdependencies that can cause data issues or performance issues. Most of all, this is not something you can get back to the user in 2 hours with new reports up and running. It requires development cycle. At the same time, in reporting tool like Jasper, you can develop these requirements directly by writing PL/SQL packages against the OLTP system, it can be a quick thing if you have a good & healthy framework
3. OBIEE has a high cost. Here, we are not just talking about the cost of OBIEE application itself (which is already pretty costly). You have to decide what ETL tool to use to work with OBIEE, if you happen to pick Informatica, then great, that's another high expenses. On top of that, you are going to need more resources, data architects, ETL developers, OBIEE developers, DBA and maybe more guys. That can be an expensive team right there. On top of that, you are not just going to have one machine that takes care of all these projects, you are going to need more machines, more hardware & software resources. That's another expense. Now, how do you feel after spending all these money but have to wait for development cycles (with high probability of delays and issues) to get job 1 and 2 done, while you see some other projects that use less than 1/50 of sources than yours but can get the requirement more agilely and dynamically done in much less time?
4. OBIEE is less flexible, less customizable (graphs, look and feels and other programmable integration features). Requirements can come in various ways. Not all of the OBIEE features are created to satisfy them. That's why there are always new enhancement request being made against the product, but it's up to the future release of the product to decide which ER can be fulfilled. If you are currently implementing your project, don't count on future releases. Open source reporting tools are much more flexible. These tools are good for people that knows how to program, how to mess around. It's like Iphone vs Android (oops I said it again) .
5. OBIEE works strictly on relational data models. In order for OBIEE to work, your BMM layer needs to have your logic tables set up and arranged according to standard star-schema. This can be a big restriction if your requirement is very complex that doesn't translate to standard star schema. Often, you will have to take the data fields from the source and design your pre-computed aggregate tables in order to make OBIEE's job easier, in other words, the complexity goes to ETL layer. Then again, why would I spend too much money to have OBIEE does easy stuffs where pre-computations are spoon fed to you? In open source tools or some other BI tools like Business Object, it is much more flexible in terms of what data model can be worked with directly with reporting.
The above are some of the most common areas where the OBIEE project has difficult challenges, specifically when expectation is not met. So before you get into OBIEE, you have to know where you are getting into to best avoid the difficult situations later on.
In my opinion, the value of OBIEE lays in the solution being delivered to you. Take BI Apps for instance, it is the best example of how OBIEE can be advantageous when the entire framework of solution is already provided to you after years of research of various business scenarios. The package, which includes DB schemas, ETL framework, reports and dashboards are already designed and engineered with the best solution in the most optimized way, can save clients tons of money and time for getting the information they desire. Imagine how it's going to be if you have to do your own research, requirement gathering, design and engineering of BI solution? Well, unless you are a genius :)
Another advantage of OBIEE is that it is easier to get into. Since the programming aspect of it is minimum, a lot of the education are conceptual based. Therefore, OBIEE can be favored by those who wants to rely on some object oriented tools to get the job done, instead of doing their own coding on a black screen. Jasper is more for programmers, it requires good understanding and design of the DB model to help optimize the report queries, or it can run very slow. For OBIEE, the performance can be much faster with standard star-schema designs (the price to pay is the time spent on ETL development cycle).
There is no perfect tool, it's up to the individuals, from company visionaries to architects, from engineers and project managers to make things work perfectly. But knowing the limitation of each tools, I hope it can drive future improvement of these technologies, but more importantly, help the decision makers to make the right decision from the beginning.
Thanks
Any tools can look great during POC where you don't have real data and real scalability issues. Every problem can be solved 'in theory' if the simple POC works. Look at T.V commercials, advertisements, these are the work of the best marketing genius of the world. They know how to make things look great on T.V, in ads and in demo, which is just a variation of the 'prove of concept' for general consumers. What happen after you blow your wallet for some magical weight-loss pills or some total package home care system, or even a weekend self-help workshops that promises to change your life? Then you realize that things aren't as good as what you see at first site. The bottom-line, POC is just a simple sales demo, which is not restricted to any specific environments against specific wants and needs. Now it is the buyer's responsibility to know how to apply that to their specific requirements and making it work. Anyways, enough of that.
Now lets look at what are some of the things that OBIEE isn't very efficient at doing compared to some other open source java reporting tools:
1. The implementation of localization and internationalization of OBIEE reports isn't very straightforward. There are blogs and documents out there that explains how to do such things in OBIEE, but go through them and try to implement it yourself. You will see that it does take a lot of work. Now integrating it with other home-grown java applications while maintaining the OBIEE local languages and time zones in Synch with that application is another thing. I am not saying it can't work, but it is complicated and it does take time and resources (Money.) The same thing can be done fairly easily in tools like Jasper.
2. New reporting requirements from the business users can't always be fulfilled right away. Oftenly, the requirements are identified from the OLTP side, but it is going to go through an ETL process and OBIEE configuration process before it can be made available for reporting. Several places can cause issues and there are many interdependencies that can cause data issues or performance issues. Most of all, this is not something you can get back to the user in 2 hours with new reports up and running. It requires development cycle. At the same time, in reporting tool like Jasper, you can develop these requirements directly by writing PL/SQL packages against the OLTP system, it can be a quick thing if you have a good & healthy framework
3. OBIEE has a high cost. Here, we are not just talking about the cost of OBIEE application itself (which is already pretty costly). You have to decide what ETL tool to use to work with OBIEE, if you happen to pick Informatica, then great, that's another high expenses. On top of that, you are going to need more resources, data architects, ETL developers, OBIEE developers, DBA and maybe more guys. That can be an expensive team right there. On top of that, you are not just going to have one machine that takes care of all these projects, you are going to need more machines, more hardware & software resources. That's another expense. Now, how do you feel after spending all these money but have to wait for development cycles (with high probability of delays and issues) to get job 1 and 2 done, while you see some other projects that use less than 1/50 of sources than yours but can get the requirement more agilely and dynamically done in much less time?
4. OBIEE is less flexible, less customizable (graphs, look and feels and other programmable integration features). Requirements can come in various ways. Not all of the OBIEE features are created to satisfy them. That's why there are always new enhancement request being made against the product, but it's up to the future release of the product to decide which ER can be fulfilled. If you are currently implementing your project, don't count on future releases. Open source reporting tools are much more flexible. These tools are good for people that knows how to program, how to mess around. It's like Iphone vs Android (oops I said it again) .
5. OBIEE works strictly on relational data models. In order for OBIEE to work, your BMM layer needs to have your logic tables set up and arranged according to standard star-schema. This can be a big restriction if your requirement is very complex that doesn't translate to standard star schema. Often, you will have to take the data fields from the source and design your pre-computed aggregate tables in order to make OBIEE's job easier, in other words, the complexity goes to ETL layer. Then again, why would I spend too much money to have OBIEE does easy stuffs where pre-computations are spoon fed to you? In open source tools or some other BI tools like Business Object, it is much more flexible in terms of what data model can be worked with directly with reporting.
The above are some of the most common areas where the OBIEE project has difficult challenges, specifically when expectation is not met. So before you get into OBIEE, you have to know where you are getting into to best avoid the difficult situations later on.
In my opinion, the value of OBIEE lays in the solution being delivered to you. Take BI Apps for instance, it is the best example of how OBIEE can be advantageous when the entire framework of solution is already provided to you after years of research of various business scenarios. The package, which includes DB schemas, ETL framework, reports and dashboards are already designed and engineered with the best solution in the most optimized way, can save clients tons of money and time for getting the information they desire. Imagine how it's going to be if you have to do your own research, requirement gathering, design and engineering of BI solution? Well, unless you are a genius :)
Another advantage of OBIEE is that it is easier to get into. Since the programming aspect of it is minimum, a lot of the education are conceptual based. Therefore, OBIEE can be favored by those who wants to rely on some object oriented tools to get the job done, instead of doing their own coding on a black screen. Jasper is more for programmers, it requires good understanding and design of the DB model to help optimize the report queries, or it can run very slow. For OBIEE, the performance can be much faster with standard star-schema designs (the price to pay is the time spent on ETL development cycle).
There is no perfect tool, it's up to the individuals, from company visionaries to architects, from engineers and project managers to make things work perfectly. But knowing the limitation of each tools, I hope it can drive future improvement of these technologies, but more importantly, help the decision makers to make the right decision from the beginning.
Thanks
